I have been wondering how bare I can to go. How little information can I put down and still have the piece work. For it to have enough resonance, maybe enough fullness is a better way to put it. Just what is essential; and true. So I look at this and wonder. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
|
Square, 39 x 24 in, charcoal on Japanese paper, 2013 |
Brackets, below, I don't feel so ambiguous about. This is an interesting dilemma. Thoughts?
|
Brackets, 39 x 24 in, charcoal on Japanese paper, 2013 |
MY thoughts are that they all work really well. I think it is because of the tape. The tape gives it edge and depth.
ReplyDeleteI really like these pieces.
Thanks Roberta, love your thoughts about the tape, I hadn't thought of it that way.
DeleteI agree with Roberta. Both pieces work wonderfully and it's the tape that adds that bit of hard edge, definition and contrast. More please.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jennifer, love how others can see and articulate what I can't. Really helpful.
DeleteYou can probably go with even less if you keep exploring the matter but these two are beautiful.
ReplyDeleteThanks Marina, I think you are right and I think there is a lot of fear [for me] to less.....so i will keep exploring.
DeleteI'm loving these, Liz. There's definitely something in there between the brackets. The space becomes its own identity.
ReplyDeleteThanks Connie, brackets was about breathing to me, about fullness and holding gently.
DeleteYes you have a very alive piece of space between the brackets. Love the simplicity Liz.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jack, I felt that the space between had to be the most alive, even though it was the emptiest. Glad you like it.
DeleteThere is space to move in these. I like that. Room to take a breath.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much Leslie, you have said just what I hoped to achieve!
DeleteBrackets is beautiful - so spare but full of possibilities.....
ReplyDeleteThanks so much Charlotte, I am so enjoying doing these works, as you say the possibilities are endless.
Delete